<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Third Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Neuroscience and the Humanities</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Neuroesthetics, Part 2 by Painting from Photos - Consciousness and Purpose of Art (7) &#171; Images and Imagination</title>
		<link>http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/07/06/neuroesthics-part-2/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Painting from Photos - Consciousness and Purpose of Art (7) &#171; Images and Imagination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/07/06/neuroesthics-part-2/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] accept it as art or not - please see Jon Bardin and his blog &#8220;The Third Culture&#8221; about Neuroesthetic  and the theories of the perception of art. This is a whole new field of neuroscience we just begin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] accept it as art or not - please see Jon Bardin and his blog &#8220;The Third Culture&#8221; about Neuroesthetic  and the theories of the perception of art. This is a whole new field of neuroscience we just begin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Art, Context, and the Brain by bohemian scientist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Encephalon 28: Neuroscience Blarnival!</title>
		<link>http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/art-context-and-the-brain/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>bohemian scientist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Encephalon 28: Neuroscience Blarnival!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/art-context-and-the-brain/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] at the third culture, jon follows up his two part series on neuroaesthetics with a post on art, context, and the brain. he asks with subtlety, &#8220;if we are to believe that there is some way to understand reactions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at the third culture, jon follows up his two part series on neuroaesthetics with a post on art, context, and the brain. he asks with subtlety, &#8220;if we are to believe that there is some way to understand reactions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Neuroesthetics and Conceptual Art by Art, Context, and the Brain &#171; The Third Culture</title>
		<link>http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/neuroesthetics-and-conceptual-art/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Art, Context, and the Brain &#171; The Third Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/neuroesthetics-and-conceptual-art/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] I have written in a previous post about the importance and placement of conceptual art within the neuroesthetic context, and of the ability, for example, of a telegram or chemically preserved animal to make conceptual statements in a neurally meaningful way. In this way, the everyday can become art because it is metaphor made concrete. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have written in a previous post about the importance and placement of conceptual art within the neuroesthetic context, and of the ability, for example, of a telegram or chemically preserved animal to make conceptual statements in a neurally meaningful way. In this way, the everyday can become art because it is metaphor made concrete. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Neuroesthetics and Conceptual Art by encephalon 27 &#171; neurocontrarian</title>
		<link>http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/neuroesthetics-and-conceptual-art/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>encephalon 27 &#171; neurocontrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/neuroesthetics-and-conceptual-art/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Bardin has posted a second part to his initial neuroesthetics theorizing. You can read part 1 here and part 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bardin has posted a second part to his initial neuroesthetics theorizing. You can read part 1 here and part 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Neuroesthetics and Conceptual Art by vyala</title>
		<link>http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/neuroesthetics-and-conceptual-art/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>vyala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdculture.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/neuroesthetics-and-conceptual-art/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>After reading this article and the second part of it I understood for the first time what "conceptual art" is all about. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this article and the second part of it I understood for the first time what &#8220;conceptual art&#8221; is all about. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
